The blogged wandering of Robert W. Anderson
What an absolutely ridiculous idea, that so-called “application neutrality” should be a part of net neutrality.
It is hard to imagine that this is just intended to garner press, because after all, the response can probably be summed up as:
- Blackberry is still a company?
- Blackberry doesn’t have any apps.
Am I missing something here?
“Application neutrality” . . . love it.
If that happens, let’s go further and legislate that all apps must be available for Linux. And Wii. And Windows Mobile 6.
Link: BlackBerry CEO Wants Legislators To Make Developing BlackBerry Apps Mandatory
I am in the “pro email encryption” camp. If encrypting all email communications was easy enough, I would do it. I won’t get into “easy enough” here, but the issue is really about encrypting for a particular recipient, most of whom don’t care about encryption in the first place. I used to routinely digitally sign my emails as well, but stopped doing that for the same reason — most recipients didn’t know what to make of it.
Anyway, I’m coming to this topic now indirectly because of Google’s new “End to End” product / plugin / stance. Sounds cool, and I’m sure I’ll check it out.
In A World without Hearsay, Jon Udell tackles the question of why he used to digitally sign his emails and then discusses an argument made by Yaron Goland in a post with a very long title: Why Google’s support of PGP Mail might not be such a brilliant idea – Or, why I don’t like digital signatures for social networking and how Thali addresses this
In that post, the author likes digital signatures to a roving notary public:
A digital signature is intended to be an authenticator, a way for someone other than us to prove that we did/said something. When we use digital signatures for momentous things that should be on the public record, like mortgage documents perhaps, then they serve a good purpose. But with PGP Mail we suddenly sign… well… everything. It’s like having a notary public walking behind you all day long stamping every statement, note, mail, etc. as provably and irrevocably yours.
I don’t think we want such records to exist. I think we want a much more ephemeral world where the bulk of what we do just quietly vanishes into the ether leaving as little of a trail as possible.
I completely agree that we would be better off in a more ephemeral world, but the notary public analogy is completely wrong.
A notary public does in fact record (in a physical record book) every action, along with a physical signature and a fingerprint (noting that the specifics may differ across jurisdictional boundaries). Signing one’s own email does no such thing. It does not create a record, and does not make cause the email to become more permanent than it was without a signature.
It may be harder to deny that you wrote it; however, the more automated (or easy) it is to make such signatures, the less likely that such emails will have any weight over a non-signed email in a court of law.
To be clear, I’m not harshing on Thali — I have no opinion on that right now — I just don’t think the signature/notary argument has merit.
Tags: Attention, Web2.0
Windows 8.1 was just Released to Manufacturing (RTM). For the first time in as long as I can remember, developers are not getting access to the RTM before the launch date.
Some developers are upset because they are building Windows 8 applications or at the very least need to ensure their applications work on the new OS before it is released. This is a fair point.
I think most people are upset because they are forced to wait to upgrade their own systems. Too bad, so sad.
So why did Microsoft make this change? Because Windows 8.1 isn’t ready. According to a TechCrunch post:
We are continuing to put the finishing touches on Windows 8.1 to ensure a quality experience at general availability for (all) customers.
So it isn’t ready, but it has RTMed. So what does RTM even mean?
Maybe “M” doesn’t mean manufacturing this time. According to a post in the Windows App Builder Blog (italics mine):
Today we announced that Windows 8.1 has hit the RTM milestone. That means our hardware partners are now preparing their devices for the holiday buying season, beginning with the general availability of Windows 8.1 starting at 12:00 A.M. on October 18 . . .
Maybe this time it means manufacturers. This release is all about getting Windows 8.1 in systems for the holiday buying season. You can be sure the big device manufacturers already have their Windows 8.1 RTM.
I would argue this isn’t really an RTM at all — because it isn’t finished — but if Microsoft had waited until mid October to actually RTM, then no holiday sales.
RTMC: Release to Merry Christmas!
So, Live/Windows/Microsoft Messenger is shutting down and Microsoft is pushing people to Skype. I actually haven’t run Messenger for many years. I suppose it would be mildly interesting to see what a migration process looks like.
But, I keep getting emails from Microsoft to “Upgrade” to Skype and I don’t see where this is a migration path. So I clicked on the “Upgrade now” link in the email.
While there was nothing obvious on that page, there is Skype Community help widget. I quickly decided against it, considering the recent help people have received there.
I published a post last week about the Tesla S Performance; and now the post is gone and I see no record of it. Something wrong with my hosting company? Or with my installation of WordPress?
Anyway, just a test post . . . nothing to see here.
I’m going to the DR National Town Meeting in DC. Let me know if you’ll be there and we can meet.
Check out the series on Identity Management as a Service (IdMaaS) on Kim Cameron’s blog here and here.
The Microsoft Surface (no, not the table), looks pretty cool. Not too surprising that Microsoft decided to do this themselves, let’s just hope it isn’t a Zune. Maybe that will be my first full tablet. Probably x86, although that is just asking for trouble, I know. It will be interesting to see if there is a hardware-vendors backlash. And then is a Microsoft phone next? Maybe this is the strongest indication that Microsoft might actual buy Nokia.
.NET 4.5 doesn’t run on Windows Server 2003. Huh.
An Arduino Satellite project on Kickstarter. I want one.
This is one of those times when I have something to say quickly, but just can’t be bothered to try to say it in 140 characters.
@rwandering: Listening to the new 24 x 96 unlimited Ram from @paulmccartney — sounds fantastic.
@cgerrish: So you’ve taken sides in #occupyaudio ? Have you read this?
My response to that:
Yeah, yeah, us mere mortals can’t hear anything. Sure. (I haven’t read the article yet).
My own experience says the following:
- 24 bit mixing is really a big deal.
- 24 bit (or higher?) transfer from tape is a big deal.
- 24 bit mastering (i.e. 24 bits as the output ) is also pretty big.
- 44 kHz is probably just fine.
But if I get something in 24/96 I’m probably going to listen to it that way (not on my iPhone!).
There is no doubt that one of the reasons this new Ram (and all the recent McCartney remasters and the Beatles 24-bit audio) sound so great is because of the newer technology in place today to transfer from tape to digital, and to do it at higher bit rates — there was no 24-bit mixing going on to my knowledge. There are two fantastic examples backing up 24-bit (or higher?) mixing though: The Beatles Yellow Submarine Songbook and the Beatles Love (and according to Steve Gillmor), The Beatles Rock Band music (though I’ve never heard it directly).
That is one heck of a lot of parenthetical phrases, but anyway . . . have I taken a side? It seems so.
Taking a page out of Marc’s book, I’m going to start linking to things I think are interesting (or useful) in digest form.
Microsoft is changing the free storage for SkyDrive from 25GB to 7GB. If you are an existing user, though, you can get grandfathered in, but you have to logon and tell them you want it.
With Google Drive finally released, Aaron Levie of box posts When Elephants Attack. While I do agree with the sentiment (race to bottom for free storage / clear vision and value of box), I find the basic claim of “Elephant attacking startup” a bit weak. Both Box and SalesForce (the latter also mentioned in the post) followed the same playbook going after one of the elephants from day 1. I don’t have a problem with that at all, but the post implies this sort of passive “we became a target” and states explicitly that “Salesforce became the target of Microsoft . . .” without ever mentioning that they were actually hunting for that elephant all along.
I appreciate Mike Arrington’s post on Acqui-hires and the follow up today. There is no doubt he has a vested interest in the venture capital standard terms — although, who doesn’t in this business? — but, I read his posts as being straight up, honest, and valuable.
McCartney’s RAM is being re-released in deluxe packaging (and better, in 24-bit 96kHz). great album, there is a cool video here.
Reading the news on an unplanned overnight in Houston, I see that Microsoft is sticking with “Windows 8″ as the name of the next Windows client.
I can only imagine there was some heated debate on whether to give it an evocative name or stick with a sequence of numbers. I’m glad the sequence won out, even if just for now.
I much prefer the “8” and then, I hope “9”, etc. I don’t really care that these are names and not version numbers, but I do care that there they make sense to customers and partners alike.
Plus all the evocative names start sounding like brands of cars.
I just came back from Costa Rica, and I swear I saw someone driving a Windows Azule.
Tags: .NET, Windows
Next entries »
I had a problem with my OPPO BDP-83 Blu-ray player, so I contacted support at OPPO to see what to do. They gave me an RMA and instructions for returning the unit for repair.
It took me about a month to get it shipped — the unit was still functional and we use it fairly often. Anyway, I packaged it up and sent it off.
- Tuesday morning, I dropped it at UPS.
- Wednesday morning, they received it and I got an email explaining their process.
- Wednesday afternoon, I was told it was fixed and would be shipped back to me.
- Thursday (today) I received it. All fixed, works great.
Great service, and something like a 6 hour turnaround from their service center! Amazing!
This is truly an excellent unit, and way beyond a typical consumer player. Blu-ray too is excellent. Even my wife — who generally doesn’t care about video/audio fidelity — really prefers watching on Blu-ray.
For those who say they don’t need Blu-ray because of streaming, well, they must have some pretty incredible bandwidth . . . or (more likely) they don’t actually care about fidelity. In a world of 128-bit MP3s, I suppose I shouldn’t be too surprised.
Anyway, thanks OPPO, keep up the good work!
BTW: When I opened the box, the top piece of cardboard was for the newer model, the OPPO BDP-93. For a second I got my hopes up, “did OPPO send me a new unit?!??!”. Of course, not . . .