Comments on: More on SSDL http://rwandering.net/2006/01/30/more-on-ssdl/ The blogged wandering of Robert W. Anderson Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:33:27 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Robert W. Anderson http://rwandering.net/2006/01/30/more-on-ssdl/comment-page-1/#comment-5104 Robert W. Anderson Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:27:45 +0000 http://rwandering.net/?p=133#comment-5104 Jim, Thanks for the comment. BTW, I'm not disappointed in you; I just hope that your work comes to more than a tool for the academics and geeks. Cheers, Robert Jim,

Thanks for the comment.

BTW, I’m not disappointed in you; I just hope that your work comes to more than a tool for the academics and geeks.

Cheers,
Robert

]]> By: Jim Webber http://rwandering.net/2006/01/30/more-on-ssdl/comment-page-1/#comment-5103 Jim Webber Mon, 30 Jan 2006 23:06:32 +0000 http://rwandering.net/?p=133#comment-5103 Hey Robert, I would love for SSDL to take off too, I just see that lots of well-meaning organisations have put a serious amount of money into making WSDL and BPEL vaguely work, and it would be unpallitable to their shareholders to then switch horses. But if there ever were to be an OASIS or W3C standards group on SSDL then I would be there, front and centre. Jim Hey Robert,

I would love for SSDL to take off too, I just see that lots of well-meaning organisations have put a serious amount of money into making WSDL and BPEL vaguely work, and it would be unpallitable to their shareholders to then switch horses.

But if there ever were to be an OASIS or W3C standards group on SSDL then I would be there, front and centre.

Jim

]]>