Expert Texture Home Contact me About Subscribe Digipede Connect on LinkedIn rwandering on Twitter rwandering on FriendFeed

rwandering.net

The blogged wandering of Robert W. Anderson

Interested in ASP.NET for your startup?

A question I ask Microsoft people frequently is: what are you doing to promote your tools in the Web 2.0 world / to help SaaS startups use your technologies?
I saw two posts today that, while not answering this question, seem to me like progress:

ASP.NET 2.0 Training Center

Microsoft (and CMP and O’Reilly and Dr. Dobb’s) have rolled out the ASP.NET 2.0 Training Center. This is to help PHP / JSP / ColdFusion developers learn about .NET. This looks like a great resource for developers to learn about the capabilities of .NET. If you are a developer using one of these other technologies, check it out. There is a free copy of Visual Studio 2005 Standard in it for you if you view 3 webinars.

Obviously, this is a great tactic to get non-.NET users to see what ASP.NET has to offer — I’m sure they’ll get plenty of free-riders too ;)

I found out about this from an O’Reilly post (see ASP.Net on a Roll). According to them, ASP.NET 2.0 is gaining leverage (as measured by book sales). Good news for Microsoft and for developers. ASP.NET is really a great way to build Web sites and services. I personally much prefer this to PHP, for example. Scripting languages are fine, but I’m in the strong-typing camp. And now since ASP.NET 2.0 can recompile your code on the server, it takes away a major scripting advantage.

Microsoft Startup Zone

In Microsoft Startup Zone Launches, Don Dodge announces the new Microsoft Startup Zone, sort of a portal into Microsoft’s Emerging Business Team. This site is full of resources for startup companies. While I still would like to see a partner program for SaaS startups, this site is worth a visit if you want to see what Microsoft has to offer emerging companies.

Tags: , , , ,

    Trackback

2 Comments »

    Jim Benson wrote @ March 6th, 2006 at 7:37 am

Measured by book sales …. I own three ASP.NET books and have one ASP site (http://traffic.511.org). But haven’t continued with ASP.NET because it is difficult to create good code with it. It’s powerful and does interesting things – but comments and annotation are still a challenge. That makes it challenging for a distributed team to easily maintain code not written by the maintaining group member.

So, according to book sales, I’m a lot more interested in ASP.NET than I actually am.

    Robert W. Anderson wrote @ March 6th, 2006 at 8:21 am

O’Reilly lists some defence of their book sales argument on their page, I think.

ASP.NET 2.0 is better for teams working on projects together (my guess is that traffic.511.org is ASP.NET 1.1); however, what are you comparing it against for comments and annotation?

Your comment

HTML-Tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>