<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interested in ASP.NET for your startup?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rwandering.net/2006/03/05/interested-in-aspnet-for-your-startup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rwandering.net/2006/03/05/interested-in-aspnet-for-your-startup/</link>
	<description>The blogged wandering of Robert W. Anderson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 10:40:46 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert W. Anderson</title>
		<link>http://rwandering.net/2006/03/05/interested-in-aspnet-for-your-startup/comment-page-1/#comment-15725</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert W. Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 16:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rwandering.net/2006/03/05/interested-in-aspnet-for-your-startup/#comment-15725</guid>
		<description>O&#039;Reilly lists some defence of their book sales argument on their page, I think.

ASP.NET 2.0 is better for teams working on projects together (my guess is that traffic.511.org is ASP.NET 1.1); however, what are you comparing it against for comments and annotation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O&#8217;Reilly lists some defence of their book sales argument on their page, I think.</p>
<p>ASP.NET 2.0 is better for teams working on projects together (my guess is that traffic.511.org is ASP.NET 1.1); however, what are you comparing it against for comments and annotation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Benson</title>
		<link>http://rwandering.net/2006/03/05/interested-in-aspnet-for-your-startup/comment-page-1/#comment-15724</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 15:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rwandering.net/2006/03/05/interested-in-aspnet-for-your-startup/#comment-15724</guid>
		<description>Measured by book sales .... I own three ASP.NET books and have one ASP site (http://traffic.511.org).  But haven&#039;t continued with ASP.NET because it is difficult to create good code with it.  It&#039;s powerful and does interesting things - but comments and annotation are still a challenge.  That makes it challenging for a distributed team to easily maintain code not written by the maintaining group member.

So, according to book sales, I&#039;m a lot more interested in ASP.NET than I actually am.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Measured by book sales &#8230;. I own three ASP.NET books and have one ASP site (<a href="http://traffic.511.org" rel="nofollow">http://traffic.511.org</a>).  But haven&#8217;t continued with ASP.NET because it is difficult to create good code with it.  It&#8217;s powerful and does interesting things &#8211; but comments and annotation are still a challenge.  That makes it challenging for a distributed team to easily maintain code not written by the maintaining group member.</p>
<p>So, according to book sales, I&#8217;m a lot more interested in ASP.NET than I actually am.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
