<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Apple Won&#8217;t Dominate Next Gen Computing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rwandering.net/2008/03/12/why-apple-wont-dominate-next-gen-computing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rwandering.net/2008/03/12/why-apple-wont-dominate-next-gen-computing/</link>
	<description>The blogged wandering of Robert W. Anderson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:24:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Apple Won&#8217;t Dominate</title>
		<link>http://rwandering.net/2008/03/12/why-apple-wont-dominate-next-gen-computing/comment-page-1/#comment-187836</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Apple Won&#8217;t Dominate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 04:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rwandering.net/2008/03/12/why-apple-wont-dominate-next-gen-computing/#comment-187836</guid>
		<description>[...] found this nice little nugget suggesting why Apple won&#8217;t take over the industry the way Microsoft did.  He&#8217;s not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] found this nice little nugget suggesting why Apple won&#8217;t take over the industry the way Microsoft did.  He&#8217;s not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert W. Anderson</title>
		<link>http://rwandering.net/2008/03/12/why-apple-wont-dominate-next-gen-computing/comment-page-1/#comment-156623</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert W. Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rwandering.net/2008/03/12/why-apple-wont-dominate-next-gen-computing/#comment-156623</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, Roger.   Yeah, you are right.  The greater point is that nobody can dominate in the way that Alex Iskold suggests.  The real world is too diverse in too many ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Roger.   Yeah, you are right.  The greater point is that nobody can dominate in the way that Alex Iskold suggests.  The real world is too diverse in too many ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Holmes</title>
		<link>http://rwandering.net/2008/03/12/why-apple-wont-dominate-next-gen-computing/comment-page-1/#comment-156575</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Holmes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 09:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rwandering.net/2008/03/12/why-apple-wont-dominate-next-gen-computing/#comment-156575</guid>
		<description>A good number of relevant points given in the article without mentioning the most relevant point of the lot - When our friends at Redmond, Washington State tried to have a computer on every desk and all running (guess what) the real world said &quot;NO WAY KNOWN&quot;. Reality has a way of bring common sense to many things</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good number of relevant points given in the article without mentioning the most relevant point of the lot &#8211; When our friends at Redmond, Washington State tried to have a computer on every desk and all running (guess what) the real world said &#8220;NO WAY KNOWN&#8221;. Reality has a way of bring common sense to many things</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

